Archive for the ‘ Women ’ Category

So you think it is equal already hey?

Often when I am discussing feminism, people who argue against me say that the majority of inequality is in the past and in other countries (such as ones that practice purdah). Well, we may have had strides in the past, but there is some ways to go… look at the following stats from the excellent book Women Don’t Ask:

Women constitute:
98% of child care workers
82% of elementary school teachers
91% of nurses
99% of secretaries

Men constitute:
87.5% of the corporate officers of the 500 largest companies
90% of engineers
98% of construction workers
70% of financial managers*

In a study conducted in the 1990s, they calculated that for women and men to be equally distributed into similar types of jobs, 77% of women working today would need to change jobs. And more inequality:

In 2000, women owned 40% of all businesses in the United States (a total of 9.1 million female-owned businesses) but received only 2.3% of the available venture-capital dollars. **

I’m not trying to explore reasons or make judgments in this post, but the 99% of female secretaries vs. the 87.5% of male corporate officers stat alone tells us that there is still a lot of work to be done!

*All stats are from 2001 from pg. 72 of this edition of Women Don’t Ask
**pg 62

The He/She Ratio

I found this He/She Ratio tool that compares the instances of "He" on a domain compared to the instances of "She". I took my favourite news sources and checked out the results:

So, do you think that anybody is left out?

Standing Up for What You Think is Sexy

I have been dating again lately, and for the first time ever said upfront that I am a feminist. When I say it, I use the definition of a feminist found on Alas, a blog:

A feminist:

  1. Advocates for the social, political, and economic equality of the sexes.
  2. Believes that there is current, significant, society-wide inequality and sexism.
  3. Doesn’t believe that men are the primary victims of inequality and sexism.

So, generally, you would think that being a feminist would scare away some guys. I figured that I would get guys that would hear it, then immediately scatter, like a cockroaches exposed to light. And, I thought that would be an okay thing, because if someone is totally against feminism and won’t discuss it… we are probably not compatible. I figured at least it would make my dating pool smaller. But… I was totally wrong. That hasn’t happened at all. It has brought up interesting debates and conversations. I’ve gotten to hear about strong, successful women that these guys respect. And… I’ve been applauded for my professional, entrepreneurial and intellectual endeavors.

This whole standing up for what I think thing has been very rewarding… even on the dating scene. I only wish I had done it sooner. And, I wish more people would do the same – not just about feminism but about anything they believe.

Image and Striving for Floating Brains

I remember when I got out of school and started my first corporate job, some strange things were happening. Even though I was a Marketing Analyst, the receptionists told me that I would have to take the phones on their breaks. Also, people would give me their coats and ask me to take messages for my boss. Eventually I figured it out… because people were used to young women being assistants and receptionists in that office, they did not "get" that I was there to analyze the business and market products. So – my young looks and my gender trumped my education, good grades, skills or even job description to them.

My sister-in-law, who is a physician, had the same problem when she started interning – the nurses assumed she was a nurse too, and there was a very awkward moment when she was asked to change bedpans! My brother, who is also a physician, never had an issue. Of course, my sister-in-law and I set them straight, but if you think that the old-fashioned attitudes are gone – think again!

The opposite is also true. I worked with a man who owned a PR company, which he started in his early-20s. He said the secret to starting his business young was that he started balding when he was 22, so people thought he was older and more trustworthy at an early age. I guess I never had the ‘luxury’ of balding ;) .

This weekend something else strange happened. During Easter, people kept asking me about my son – how old he was, what grade etc. My son? I don’t have a son! Then I figured it out – my 5-year-old nephew and I are very close, we kept playing together and he kept coming to me and there is a pretty strong family resemblance – so from that they assumed he was mine. Again, I set them straight – but it surprised me that people thought I was a Mom when I think of myself as a single-urban-career-chick ready for the next adventure.

So – maybe this isn’t all that revelatory, but I tend to think of the world on a pretty equal basis. Meaning, you are your ideas, your words, your warmth, your experiences… not your looks, your race, your age, your gender or your act. I remember my Psychology 101 professor saying he perceived people as "floating brains", culling away all outside appearances and seeing people for what they are. But, I see most people don’t think that way. Actually, some people laugh their heads off when I explain the "floating brains" thing. It’s too bad because I think it is a pretty good ideal to strive for.

Okay, this Stuff Has Got to Stop Happening

In reading about what happened to Kathy Sierra, prominent Marketing blogger, I was disappointed but not surprised. Kathy received death threats and is now unable to attend presentations that she was going to give at a technology conference. You can see in her post that some guy threatened to kill her and perform sexual acts on her against her will. There is also a disturbing S&M picture. She says:

I do not want to be part of a culture–the Blogosphere–where this is considered acceptable. Where the price for being a blogger is kevlar-coated skin and daughters who are tough enough to not have their "widdy biddy sensibilities offended" when they see their own mother Photoshopped into nothing more than an objectified sexual orifice, possibly suffocated as part of some sexual fetish. (And of course all coming on the heels of more explicit threats)

I do not want to be part of a culture where this is done not by some random person, but by some of the most respected people in the tech blogging world. People linked to by A-listers like Doc Searls, a co-author of Chris Locke.

Similarly, Amanda Marcotte had violent and sexual threats posted against her, leading her to quit the John Edwards campaign. So, what we are seeing is women who are outspoken, being silenced by crazy trolls who want to "do things" to them. It is such a shame that this stuff still happens… how can you deny that these situations hold women back?

Chris Locke, author of Cluetrain Manifesto and the man who owned and moderated the sites which posted the threats against Kathy, says the following in defense:

However, given that half the human race consists of women, it should not come as a newsflash that some of them — in about equal proportion to men — are stupid, venal, dishonest, or just generally annoying. Expressing such an opinion may be distasteful to some and vehemently argued by others, but last time I checked, having a negative opinion of a public figure was neither a federal offense nor an expression of misogyny.

I did write two comments on the "Bob’s Yer Uncle" site, which I am happy to repeat for the record: 1) "Kathy Sierra is a hopeless dipshit."; and 2) "The only ‘passionate users’ I know are crack heads." I do not like Kathy Sierra. I like her even less after her post of Monday. If she is waiting for me to apologize for something I did or said, she is going to have a very long wait.

Now, this is a typical exaggerated response. A woman is trying not to be victimized in a sexual and violent way… then someone comes out and says that she is a wimp and can’t be criticized at all. Not true! Of course many women have stupid ideas, just as many men do. So – it is not the debating ideas part that is objectionable. It is the violence and the threats! And, in recognizing that women have a bigger challenge in that area and potentially standing up for them (such as nice-guy Hugh MacLeod and many of the commenters on Kathy’s post) maybe this stupid problem can start going away.

Sima Samar – Human Rights in Afghanistan

People_dr_sima_samar_small3 In 2002, I was fortunate enough to attend a public lecture of Dr. Sima Samar, who was the Deputy President of the interim government in Afghanistan. Her words, her bravery and her mission were impossible to forget. She wanted to improve the human rights situation in Afghanistan (for example, making rape illegal) and allow women to go back to school and work (under the Taliban, women were not allowed to work, and buying a girl a pencil and notebook was considered a crime.) Not long after I saw her speak, she was threatened with death and harassed for questioning Islamic laws and subsequently left her post.

I tried to find a transcript of her talk at University of Toronto, but I couldn’t. The closest I could see was her speech at Brown. The following quotes are from that speech. On human rights violations:

As a part of our national consultation process, we released our report, A Call for Justice, that represented the opinions of the Afghan people on transitional justice. We conducted interviews of 4,151 people and more than 200 focus groups involving thousands more people. Of the people surveyed, 69 percent identified themselves or immediate family members as victims of human rights violations in the course of the last two decades of conflict.

On women going back to school:

The media shows thousands of girls going to school, but they do not show what the quality of education is and how many girls do not have access to education facilities. It is the lucky girl that walks for two hours with a piece of bread to get an education, but even these facilities are not available to most girls. The media also does not show the more than 30 girls’ schools that have been set on fire or bombed by fundamentalists in the past three years.

On thesouthasian.com from 2001, speaks about the problems from a medical point of view:

Sima also has a medical clinic in Kabul. "Almost every woman I see has osteomalacia," Samar says. "Their bones are softening due to a lack of Vitamin D. They survive on a diet of tea and naan because they can’t afford eggs and milk and, to complicate matters, their burqas and veils deprive them of sunshine. On top of that, depression is endemic here because the future is so dark."

I find this woman to be one of the most inspirational people I have ever seen speak. Despite her uphill battle, she still keeps fighting for the cause she believes in. She says:

I have three strikes against me,- I’m a woman, I speak out for women and I’m a Hazara, one of the minority tribes.

Even with those strikes, she still continues to be strong and to speak out for and inspire others around the world. In her speech at Brown she finishes with:

Sometimes I think of the world as a bird. If a wing or a country is broken, the bird cannot fly. As a global community, we are all responsible for treating the bird so that it will fly.

Talking Behind Other People’s Back – Watch Out!

Img_07171Img_07181_1 You see, I drove through this on Monday, and finally made it after my 45 minute commute. Then, I had a few meetings, at my main client (where I spend 4 days a week) and moved along some projects. Now – it is all a bit dreary because of the weather and the long commute to the suburbs, but really it wasn’t so bad so far. I kind of like puttering around the office and the people I work with are very nice. But, the weather was a prelude to what was to come in the afternoon.

Here is the scoop. I was at my desk writing an e-mail, when a woman I work with came to me with a question on a new policy. She did not like the answer, and went on to raise her voice, make her face turn read, talk in cognitive distortions (saying things like "millions" and "all the time"), threaten me and put me down. I felt a bit irritated at first, but once she started raising her voice, I calmly said "I am not comfortable with how heated this discussion is". She then did calm down, and we discussed it a bit, and we came to an agreement.

When I thought of it, I have had no one yell at me like that in my professional life, for at least three years, so of course I was a bit thrown off. Twenty minutes later, I noticed that she was not at her desk, and was concerned. I walked around the office until I found her, speaking to my main contact at this client saying "she.. she… she…" As I popped around the corner, they were both very caught off guard… I had just caught them talking about me – they admitted it immediately. 

I said "let’s all talk about this" in a direct way and after about 45 minutes it was resolved. I know that this is very bold of me, given that these are clients and it is usually better not to rock the boat. Usually I have "don’t rock the boat" pasted on my forehead. However, I know that nothing dissolves a team quicker than when there is that kind of negative talk. Everything I have ever read on teamwork encourages dealing direct with people, then escalating if that does not work. When that escalation occurs, it is best to have a mediation, where all sides are present. So – yesterday I took a risk and faced it head-on, because I knew it would be better in the long-run. 

This problem, of talking behind backs, is unfortunately a woman’s problem. I hate to admit it, but it has only been on female teams where it has been an issue… but oh what an issue it can be. I’ve seen it all – tears, quittings, sabotage, firings… and hours and hours of ruminating discussions. Usually it involves something extremely petty and something that involves control. I will not hypothesize on why this happens since I don’t have the qualifications, but I think that if women are going to get stronger in the world, we have to stop wasting our time, talking about each other behind each others backs and feeling the concomitant stress… and we have to start working with each other in a direct, constructive way (even if it means taking some risks, and popping around some corners).

Finally – A Study that Gives Women Success AND Love

Finally, after years of reading the opposite, the Boston Globe published a piece by Stephanie Coontz on how successful, educated women can also be happy in their sexual and romantic relationships. Here is some of the traditional view (don’t you want to just yawn?)

Or as a forbes.com writer put it in an August 22, 2006, column directed at men: "Don’t marry a woman with a career." She won’t look up to you, warned author Michael Noer; she won’t be happy in marriage; and she might even cheat on you.

Note to self – take all Forbes advice with a giant grain of salt… what kind of advice is that? More:

Columnist Noer writes on forbes.com that if a wife outearns her husband, both will be unhappy. And pundits have seized on the work by sociologists Wilcox and Nock to suggest that wearing rose-colored lenses and maintaining a "family myth" of fairness will help women bolster their marriages more than trying to get husbands to share housework and child care. Today’s advice to educated women seems to be, have a job if you want, but don’t earn too much money or expect too much help at home.

Here is some of the shiny new research on the matter:

One reason educated women are more likely to marry today than in the past is that modern men are less threatened by equality and more interested in finding a mate who can share the burdens of breadwinning. Many studies show that men now want a wife who is at a similar educational or occupational level. The 2001 Journal of Marriage and Family paper found that in mate-preference surveys taken in 1985 and 1996, intelligence and education had moved up to number 5 on men’s list of desirable qualities in a mate in both surveys, ahead of good looks. Meanwhile, the desire for a good cook and housekeeper had dropped to 14th place in both surveys, near the bottom of the 18-point scale. And in choosing a spouse, males with a college degree rate good looks much lower in importance than do high school graduates. "In a high-achieving man’s definition of an A-list woman, the A increasingly stands for ‘accomplished.’ "

Finally, an article that recognizes strength and potential in women, and the strength in the men who appreciate them :) . Thank you Boston Globe! Hopefully the likes of forbes.com will eventually catch up to the rest of us. 

I (Heart) Amanda Marcotte

As a Canadian, I didn’t know who US Democratic candidate John Edwards was until he hired Amanda Marcotte, blogmaster of Pandagon to work for him. I was interested and surprised, since Amanda is an outspoken feminist and her writing is pretty edgy at times. As the story unfolded, I learned more about Edwards and his campaign, and was interested to see that he stood by her even when many people were calling for her resignation because of things that she had written in her personal blog.

Unfortunately, Amanda quit the Edwards campaign within weeks, after being attacked by a "volunteer army" of right-wing bloggers who continued to denigrate her and after being denounced by the Catholic League. In a story on Salon.com, she says:

"The right-wing noise machine’s favorite trick, possibly its only trick, is to select a target and start making a fuss, hoping that by creating the appearance of smoke, just enough people will be fooled into thinking there’s a fire."

Amanda’s writing is satirical, and shocking at times, which is what makes it so interesting. I can imagine how it can spur a passionate response. But her detractors are pathetic – instead of coming back at her with an equally clever and satirical response, she was personally attacked in a very sexist way. She says:

"One question that’s hard to avoid is how much of the venom had to do with the fact that McEwan and I were young women entering into a field (Internet communications) that’s viewed as almost monolithically masculine. From my vantage point, it appeared that sexism was one of the primary motivating energies behind the campaign. Even before Donohue stepped in, various right-wing bloggers were obsessed with my gender and sexuality. As I noted at the time of my resignation, the majority of the hate mail I was receiving was from men, and almost all the e-mails made note of my gender or suggested that I would be a more pleasant woman if I wasn’t so "angry." Bluntly put, I find it hard to believe that many men would end up being denounced on TV for using words like "fuck" or "cunt" on their blog and expect to receive piles of e-mail offering an opportunity to suck the sender’s dick."

I have been in a number of arguments lately about whether or not sexism exists – how can you say it doesn’t exist when things like this still happen?

read more | digg story

Beauty and the Beast – He’s the Ugly One on the Right

Beauty_and_beast I was looking at my niece’s amazing coloring the other week, saying the genuine oohs and ahhs about her impressive work and remembering how much I used to love the subject matter she was coloring. Beauty and the Beast was always an inspirational story for me (so much so, that the story inspired my adult dating patterns… just kidding… kind of). I liked it because it was a story of compassion and non-conformity. The main female character, Belle, could see beyond the beast’s physical appearance, and love the inside of him.

Now I look at this story, and other similar ones (such as Cyrano de Bergerac) with more doubt. Why is it always the woman who has to see beyond the man’s ugliness, yet she is still pretty? Why is there never a story of a female "beast" attracting the gaze of a handsome man, who sees beyond her physical appearance and loves her from the inside? It is a message we never see – and it is another example of the double-standard between men and women. 

Actress Geena Davis, has started a movement called See Jane, which has a mandate to reduce the gender stereotyping in media made for children 11 and under. Geena says:

"By making it common for our youngest children to see everywhere a balance of active and complex male and female characters, girls and boys will grow up to empathize with and care more about each others’ stories."

You can see her making an interesting and funny speech about it at the National Conference for Media Reform: here (unfortunately the sound quality isn’t the greatest). In the speech, she outlines some key stats found in a report See Jane called Where the Girls Aren’t.

The methodology:

Where the Girls Aren’t is the first of several research briefs drawn from most in-depth content analysis of popular G-rated movies ever conducted. Led by Dr. Stacy L. Smith, researchers from the Annenberg School for Communication (ASC) at the University of Southern California (USC) studied the 101 top-grossing G-rated films released from 1990 through 2004. The research analyzed a total of 4,249 speaking characters in the movies, which included both animated and live-action films.

Key findings show that:

• In the 101 studied films, there are three male characters for every one female character.

Fewer than one out of three (28 percent) of the speaking characters both real and animated) are female.

Fewer than one in five (17 percent) of the characters in crowd scenes are female.

More than four out of five (83 percent) of the films’ narrators are male.

During the time period of the study (1990-2004), there was no gradual increase in female characters featured. Imagine the impression this leaves with young girls watching this? Davis has been speaking to different content producers regarding making changes (ie. moving towards a more 50/50 representation), and their reaction is surprise. They didn’t intentionally produce such imbalanced message, it just somehow happened. Thanks Geena, for making a difference in young girls lives :) . When we start seeing a male beauty and a female beast, even better.